Problems Researchers & Writers Face

A recent survey interviewed 270 scientists with "What is the biggest problem facing science?
Scientists states that "the success or failure rate of success as a scientist is measured by the amount of grants, the number of published research papers, and the popularity of research results these days," and also seeks "publicly meaningful presentations" “I tend to be
Scientists are said to learn more from failure than success, but failure can have a negative impact on their career as a scientist, and dissertation writers and they are forced to prioritize retention over questioning. There is no situation. Under these circumstances, Assistant Professor Paul Smaldino of the Department of Cognitive Information at the University of California at Merced, is concerned that "a person who has successfully used the current assessment system will be a successful scientist."
Ask an expert for your opinion.
Once, Gustave Speth, an expert in environmental law, is said to have said:
"I thought that loss of biodiversity, ecosystem collapse and climate change were the biggest environmental problems, and if we could do scientific research for 30 years, we could cope with these problems. But I was wrong, the biggest environmental problem is selfishness, greed and indifference ... ”
I think this statement is a good summary of what is a big problem in science. In fact, most of the science is about money. Universities are becoming more and more like companies. Basic science doesn't make money (application of basic science makes money, but that's not what universities do).
There is money behind the pressure that papers should be presented as soon as possible, even at the expense of reproducibility and sound research design. Money shortens the time spent on research, and scientific discoveries can not be bought without money. In addition, it is also money that drives scientists to a fiercely high competition for funding.
However, there is still room to think positively. At the very least, the problem of not having enough information about science can be solved easily. Even if you are not a professional scientist, you can understand science in detail. It should also be possible to establish a code of ethics for science reporters that "I will not report on research that I do not fully understand".
One of the major problems facing scientists today is that scientists are not "the quality or content of the research subject, but how much they will earn research expenses, how many papers to present, how much public benefit The research is evaluated according to whether it is appropriate or not. " 
Science is more about evaluation than research and discovery. The reason is that we are now facing the big problem that scientists have to keep trying to get funding. 
Funds have a major impact on scientists' research, their research results, the risks they bear, and bring about a vicious cycle. Scientists need to publish a dissertation to receive grants and grants, and a positive research result is needed to publish a dissertation. Therefore, scientists will choose “safe” research that is easy to publish a dissertation. In addition, they may even present biased research results in order to be favored by the funders. 
Some of the problems that accompany this problem include: 
False motivations lead to inadequate research design, lack of funding for re purposing research results is essential, peer-reviewed or misleading research results The problem is that it costs money, and the research results are not sufficiently communicated to the general public. In addition, it is extremely difficult to start research as a young scientist, and it is also a big problem that the reward is small. 
Both young scientists and skilled scientists, and thus science itself, face all these problems, but that doesn't mean that science is destined for decline. These problems mean that we have to reinvent the institutions that are flawed so that scientists can do important research.